Saurin bhatt biography template
Publications based on WEBDA
On this page an incomplete list of refereed publications (not including conference proceedings) from the last twenty one years which are, at least partly, based on WEBDA is presented. The list was generated with the Fulltext Search Tool of the ADS Labs. If WEBDA was helpful for your research work, an acknowledgment "This research has made use of the WEBDA database, operated at the Department of Theoretical Physics and Astrophysics of the Masaryk University" would be very much appreciated.
| Acta Astronomica: | 15 |
|---|---|
| Astronomical Journal: | 154 |
| Astronomische Nachrichten: | 23 |
| Astronomy & Astrophysics: | 386 |
| Astrophysical Journal: | 109 |
| Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series: | 10 |
| Astrophysics and Space Science: | 19 |
| Baltic Astronomy: | 11 |
| Bulletin of the Astronomical Society of India: | 11 |
| Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: | 275 |
| New Astronomy: | 33 |
| Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific: | 32 |
| Other References: | 62 |
| ------------------------------------------------------- | --- |
| Total: | 1140 |
2000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Ahumada A.V., Claria J.J., Bica E., Piatti A.E.
(2000) Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. 141, 79
Integrated spectral properties of 7 galactic open clusters
2000A&AS..141...79A
Anthony-Twarog B.J., Twarog B.A.
(2000) Astron. J. 119, 2282
CCD uvby Hbeta photometry in clusters. I. The open cluster standard, IC 4651
2000AJ....119.2282A
Debernardi Y., Mermilliod J.-C., Carquillat J.-M., Ginestet N.
(2000) Astron. Astrophys. 354, 881
Binarity of Am stars in Praesepe and Hyades
2000A&A...354..881D
Delgado A.J., Alfaro E.J.
(2000) Astron. J. 119, 1848
Search for pre-main-sequence stars in the young galactic cluster NGC 6910
2000AJ....119.1848D
Dutra C.M., Bica E.
(2000) Astron. Astrophys. 359, 347
Foreground and background dust in star cluster directions
Faculty: School of Medicine
Anatomy
Karla Coburn, DDS, PhD
Instructor of Anatomy
Darin Croft, PhD
Professor of Anatomy
Andrew Crofton, PhD
Assistant Professor of Anatomy
Clifford Harding, MD, PhD
Interim Chair and Professor of Anatomy
Meghan Newcomer, PhD
Instructor of Anatomy
Scott Simpson, PhD
Professor of Anatomy
Susanne Wish-Baratz, PhD, MBA
Associate Professor of Anatomy
Anesthesiology
Mohamed Abdalla, MD
Clinical Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology
Hesham Abdelaziz Elsharkawy, MBBS
Associate Professor of Anesthesiology
Basem Abdelmalak, MD
Professor of Anesthesiology
Joseph Abdelmalak, MBBS
Clinical Associate Professor of Anesthesiology
Bushra Abdul Aleem
Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology
Ira Abels, MD
Clinical Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology
Hinda Abramoff, MD
Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology
Ahmad Adi, MD
Clinical Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology
Avneep Aggarwal, MBBS
Clinical Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology
Benigno Aldana, MD
Clinical Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology
Andrej Alfirevic, MD
Professor of Anesthesiology
Ali Ali, DO
Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology
Jonathan Alter, MD
Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology
Balaram Anandamurthy, MBBS
Clinical Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology
C. Angela Cesar, MD
Assistant Professor Emeritus of Anesthesiology
David Anthony, MD
Clinical Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology
John Apostolakis, MD
Clinical Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology
Maged Argalious, MBBS
Professor of Anesthesiology
Sherif Assaad, MBBch
Associate Professor of Anesthesiology
Brendan Astley, MD
Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology
Rafi Avitsian, MD
Professor of Anesthesiology
Sabry Ayad, MD
Professor of Anesthesiology
Rafik Banoub, MBBS
Clinical Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology
Sabri Barsoum, MBBS
Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology
Charles Bashour, MD
Associate Professor of Anesthesiology
Hersimren Basi, MD
Clinical Assistan
Abstract
Uncontrolled resection of replication forks under stress can cause genomic instability and influence cancer formation. Extensive fork resection has also been implicated in the chemosensitivity of “BReast CAncer gene” BRCA-deficient cancers. However, how fork resection is controlled in different genetic contexts and how it affects chromosomal stability and cell survival remains incompletely understood. Here, we report a novel function of the transcription repressor ZKSCAN3 in fork protection and chromosomal stability maintenance under replication stress. We show disruption of ZKSCAN3 function causes excessive resection of replication forks by the exonuclease Exo1 and homologous DNA recombination/repair protein Mre11 following fork reversal. Interestingly, in BRCA1-deficient cells, we found ZKSCAN3 actually promotes fork resection upon replication stress. We demonstrate these anti- and pro-resection roles of ZKSCAN3, consisting of a SCAN box, Kruppel-associated box, and zinc finger domain, are mediated by its SCAN box domain and do not require the Kruppel-associated box or zinc finger domains, suggesting that the transcriptional function of ZKSCAN3 is not involved. Furthermore, despite the severe impact on fork structure and chromosomal stability, depletion of ZKSCAN3 did not affect the short-term survival of BRCA1-proficient or BRCA1-deficient cells after treatment with cancer drugs hydroxyurea, PARPi, or cisplatin. Our findings reveal a unique relationship between ZKSCAN3 and BRCA1 in fork protection and add to our understanding of the relationships between replication fork protection, chromosomal instability, and chemosensitivity.
Keywords: replication stress, fork resection, ZKSCAN3, BRCA1, chemosensitivity
Abbreviations: CldU, chlorodeoxyuridine; DSB, double-strand DNA break; HR, homologous recombination; HU, hydroxyurea; IdU, iododeoxyuridine; PARPi, PARP inhibitors; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; PBST, Triton X-100 in PBS; ZNF, zinc finger
Abstract
Novel proteins can originate de novo from non-coding DNA and contribute to species-specific adaptations. It is challenging to conceive how de novo emerging proteins may integrate pre-existing cellular systems to bring about beneficial traits, given that their sequences are previously unseen by the cell. To address this apparent paradox, we investigated 26 de novo emerging proteins previously associated with growth benefits in yeast. Microscopy revealed that these beneficial emerging proteins preferentially localize to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Sequence and structure analyses uncovered a common protein organization among all ER-localizing beneficial emerging proteins, characterized by a short hydrophobic C-terminus immediately preceded by a transmembrane domain. Using genetic and biochemical approaches, we showed that ER localization of beneficial emerging proteins requires the GET and SND pathways, both of which are evolutionarily conserved and known to recognize transmembrane domains to promote post-translational ER insertion. The abundance of ER-localizing beneficial emerging proteins was regulated by conserved proteasome- and vacuole-dependent processes, through mechanisms that appear to be facilitated by the emerging proteins’ C-termini. Consequently, we propose that evolutionarily conserved pathways can convergently govern the cellular processing of de novo emerging proteins with unique sequences, likely owing to common underlying protein organization patterns.
Keywords:de novo gene birth, de novo proteins, ER, targeting, degradation, localization
Introduction
New protein-coding genes can evolve de novo from sequences that were previously non-genic (Fig 1A). Once considered rare, de novo gene birth has now been identified in many species and is gaining considerable attention as a mechanism of molecular innovation and species-specific adaptation (Van Oss and Carvunis 2019, Weisman 2022, Broeils, Ruiz-Orera et al. 2023, Zha